Dugout ValueBaseball analysis and tools

Dugout Value tools

Trade finder

Pick a team and compare projected upgrades at its weakest positions.

Trade finder

Turn a roster hole into a short list

Pick a club, choose one of its weakest position groups, and compare projected upgrades across the league. Then open a value-matched offer in the trade builder.

2027 roster planning

Roster and contract data checked October 18, 2026. These are model comparisons, not reports of player availability.The finder uses the Offseason view (2027 on). Offers opened in the builder use the same view. Completed-season playoff odds do not restrict the offseason player pool.

Archived playoff contextFanGraphs projectionsFanGraphs odds · October 18, 2026 ↗
How needs are ranked

Each of the 8 position groups is compared with the same position on every other club: 45% season-to-date fWAR rank and 55% 2027 projected fWAR rank. fWAR means FanGraphs wins above replacement. Rotation, bullpen, and outfield are evaluated as multi-player units. The estimated upgrade compares a target with the selected team's marginal starter. Targets are then sorted by fit, which weighs control, age, health, and trade protection. These inputs do not establish availability.

1

Choose a need

Seattle Mariners position-group rankings

2

First base targets

Projected improvement, sorted by fit: veterans and short control move up; core players, injured players, and players with no-trade rights move down

3

Possible offers for Nick Kurtz

Alternative package shapes matched to a $161.9M midpoint

Prospect-led$139.0M
  • Ryan Sloan55 FV · P$47.3M
  • Felnin Celesten50 FV · SS$46.0M
  • Jonny Farmelo50 FV · OF$45.8M

$22.9M below the target’s midpoint.

Headliner + piece$117.5M
  • Kade AndersonSP · MLB$77.9M
  • Leo RivasSS/3B/2B · MLB$39.6M

$44.4M below the target’s midpoint.

Depth package$161.8M
  • Kade AndersonSP · MLB$77.9M
  • Cole Young2B/SS · MLB$58.6M
  • Ryan Bliss2B/SS/3B · MLB$25.4M

$0.0M below the target’s midpoint.

Starting points, not rumors. Packages use positive-value prospects and cost-controlled MLB players, avoid trading an incumbent from the selected hole, and show only one-to-three-player combinations within 30% of the current model—not a club’s private preferences.